St. John of Damascus and Why Images Matter

Bruce Willke Bruce Willke #theology#icons#saints

I’ve been reading On the Divine Images by St. John of Damascus, and one thing keeps standing out to me. His defense of images isn’t really about paint a...

I’ve been reading On the Divine Images by St. John of Damascus, and one thing keeps standing out to me. His defense of images isn’t really about paint and wood. It’s about something much deeper. It’s about how God teaches us through things that point beyond themselves.

One of the most fascinating observations he makes is that so much of what Christians confess is itself an image of what Scripture contains.

Take doctrines like the hypostatic union, the Trinity, or even the language of “nature” and “person.” You won’t find those words laid out in neat systematic categories in the Scriptures themselves. Yet the Church developed this language because it faithfully expresses what the Scriptures reveal. Those theological formulations are, in a sense, images. They point us to the reality contained in Scripture. We honor those formulations not because the words themselves are magical, but because they faithfully confess the truth they represent.

Honoring the Archetype, Not the Wood

That immediately helped me understand his argument for icons.

When a Christian venerates an icon of Christ or one of the saints, he is not honoring wood and paint. He is honoring the person depicted. The image is valuable because it points beyond itself to its archetype.

St. John appeals to Christ’s own words about the coin bearing Caesar’s image. The coin receives honor because of whose image it bears, not because the metal itself possesses some inherent dignity. The image directs us to the one represented.

That distinction seems so obvious once it’s stated, yet it clears away so many misconceptions.

The Faith Is Tangible

What struck me even more, however, is that this whole discussion reveals something about the nature of the Christian faith itself.

The faith is tangible.

Christianity has never been merely about possessing correct ideas in the mind. It is something lived. It moves the body. It orders the world around us. It builds churches. It paints icons. It celebrates feasts. It kneels. It fasts. It sings. It gives alms. It baptizes. It breaks bread.

Truth becomes embodied.

Reading St. Basil alongside St. John reinforced this for me. Basil speaks about the memory of the saints blessing the whole world. But memory doesn’t preserve itself. It requires action. Someone must write. Someone must paint. Someone must build. Someone must commemorate. Someone must tell the story again.

Memory becomes visible.

In many ways, the controversy over images wasn’t simply a debate over religious artwork. It was a debate over whether the Christian faith is something merely internal or something that necessarily takes visible form.

The fathers overwhelmingly chose the latter.

Creation Filled with Patterns

That also explains something else I found fascinating in St. John’s work. He points to Moses striking the rock and sees in the two movements an image of the Cross. Whether one agrees with every symbolic interpretation isn’t really the point. His entire way of reading Scripture assumes that God fills history with patterns that point to Christ.

Creation itself becomes symbolic.

He even says that if two pieces of wood cross one another, our minds naturally recognize the form of the Cross. We don’t honor the wood because it is wood. We honor what the form signifies.

And that led me to another observation I hadn’t considered before.

When an Image Stops Pointing

If an icon becomes so damaged that it no longer represents the person depicted, St. John says it should be respectfully discarded, even burned. Why? Because once it no longer points to the reality it was meant to reveal, it has lost its purpose.

That alone undermines the common accusation that Christians worship the material itself.

The material is never the destination.

It is the window.

The image exists to lift our minds and hearts toward the one represented. When it ceases to do that, it is no longer fulfilling its vocation.

An Incarnational View of Reality

The more I read the fathers, the more I realize they weren’t defending religious objects for their own sake. They were defending an incarnational view of reality.

God continually uses the visible to reveal the invisible.

He uses water to give new birth.

Bread and wine to communicate His life.

The laying on of hands to ordain.

Words to proclaim the Gospel.

Bodies to serve one another.

Saints to demonstrate holiness.

And images to keep before our eyes the realities they proclaim.

The Christian faith has never been a faith of abstract ideas floating around in the mind. It has always been a faith that enters history, takes on flesh, sanctifies matter, and calls us not merely to think about the truth, but to participate in it.